At Home: “zigzag”

Wed, Jun 2, 2010

At Home

“zigzag”

Today was day two of my project and I definitely found myself in a more relaxed state of mind about the whole thing. Probably because I had a few “go to” subjects I could revisit today after exploring quite a few options yesterday.

Interestingly some of the photos I tried again today didn’t turn out as interesting as yesterday. A couple of them were made with a different lens and another few just didn’t have the same lightning conditions.

I have come across the phenomenon many times before with my nature and landscape photography in particular. In nature it’s next to impossible to shoot the same subject in the same way on two different days. You will always have variations. In my case today this even applied to something as banal as the detail of a washing machine! And I abandoned the washing machine shot, but I still might come back to it.

So what’s the moral of the story? Get the image while you can. You never know what the conditions will be like next time you revisit a location or subject!

I wonder if anyone can guess what the subject is in this image?

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

If you liked this article, you may also like these:

, , ,

This post was written by:

- who has written 202 posts on Photography 24/7.

Thomas is the editor and founder of Photography 24/7. He lives in Sydney, Australia with his wife and two daugthers. If you liked this post, why not receive updates when new posts are published? Subscribe to the feed via RSS or EMAIL to get instant updates on new posts.

Contact the author

5 Responses to “At Home: “zigzag””

  1. Ingrid Says:

    Is it an inflatable toy?

    Reply

  2. Timo Says:

    A set of pencils?

    Reply

  3. Thomas Says:

    This image is actually a macro study of one our lamp shades (it’s from Le Klint who makes a certain style of lamp shades).

    I had made a few images of it the first day of the project but my wife told me “it is too obvious it’s a lamp shade” so obviously she preferred a more abstract interpretation.

    So I made a few macro studies and liked how they turned out. To me, of course, it’s still somewhat obvious what this is, but I’m actually pleased that it’s a lot more abstract to others (at least from the above two guesses).

    Thanks Ingrid and Timo!

    Reply

Leave a Reply